Interview Reflection

It has been a few days since I conducted and analyzed an interview with a former teaching colleague J.P. as part of my ETEC 533 coursework (you can see that interview analysis here). As a continuation of that work my class has been discussing and reflecting upon the issue of educational technology, how our views have changed, major issues and concerns and what areas we are interested in exploring further. The following is a brief personal refection based on our interviews and discussions.

Prior to conducting the interview I thought that I understood most aspects of the complicated interactions between our educational system and the technologies used to support learning and teaching. By conducting this interview I believe I have developed a newfound appreciation for the complexities involved. Chief among these complexities are the issues of cost, time, professional development, support and personal views. In addition to a new found appreciation for the complexities involved with implementing technology I have also begun to see the level of disparity among schools, classrooms and even teachers involved with technology in the classroom.

Most of the interviews discussed or touched on the complexities or problems associated with using technology in the classroom. Cost and time have long been two factors that impede the use of technology in the classrooms. A common thread within our discussions on the topic was that technology is expensive and time consuming to implement in your average classroom. Teachers echoed the frustrations due to financial and time constraints involved with getting technology in the classroom. Many found it difficult to implement technology it in a manner that supports learning and eases workload for the teacher.

Classic Work Day - School

Related to the aspect of time, my interview and a few others brought up the aspect of professional development and teacher/student supports. Many teachers see that these are the primary impediments to functional technology implementation. My interviewee expressed concerns over a lack of professional development and administrative support in relation to classroom technologies. It appears that if a school or district is able to overcome the cost and time factors these additional two problems remain ignored or are addressed in hindsight. It is logical that in order to help teachers teach and students learn with technology they must be supported in this endeavour. I think that support in this sense goes beyond simply professional development but actually developing a school culture around technology. Students and teachers should know why technology is important in their classroom and how best to use it. These problems could be addressed with school-wide technology policies and by giving time for teachers to discuss and play with technologies in order for them to appreciate how they will fit in the classroom setting.

The last area that I see being a concern for technology in the classroom is the individual teacher and their comfort level with technology. Although this was not discussed in detail in the class forums it is something I believe we should take into consideration. We cannot expect that all teachers will be able or desire to have any of the new technologies in their classroom. In fact I would argue that a balance between traditional teaching methods and technological tools to support them is the best strategy. I think the real issue here is enabling and educating the teacher as an individual. All we can do for our colleagues that struggle or disagree with technology in their classroom is educate them on the potential benefits and support them in any technology they choose to use. I think that any good technology plan should give teachers who know and use technology the chance to communicate with and help those teachers that struggle with it.

Despite all the insight these interview and reflections have provided I still think there are some areas that may require further exploration and research. I would like to understand more about who is making technology decisions in schools. For example who is deciding which types of PD are important or what type of hardware to purchase? I only have experience with site-managed school and would be interested to hear how other schools go about making these decisions. Coupled with how a school’s technology is managed I would also like to learn more about how teachers receive technology PD and what is the best way to assist teacher in making the right technological choices for their classrooms. My interviewee expressed a need for PD to be more hands on for teachers and give them options for how to use a give in technological tool in their classroom. I think these are very interesting areas to explore and I look forward to researching and discussing them in the future.

Touch Recognition for SMART Boards

SMART has just released a new feature for its SMART Boards that I heard about last year.  At a teacher’s convention I was talking to a SMART representative who put on his hush-hush voice and told me about a new feature that should be released in the next month.  The feature he spoke of was touch recognition in all applications.  This feature has now been released, problem is the convention was last spring.

Although the feature is late, it does add a lot of usability and enables a teacher or presenter to interact intuitively and easily with the SMART Board.  If you use the pen an ink layer is opened up and you are writing, if you use your finger you operate normal mouse commands like clicking and dragging and if you use a broad face of your hand like the palm or fist you erase ink.  This allows yet another level of interaction to these types of technologies.  This easy and intuitive interaction seems to be the focus of SMART technologies as they continue to expand their educational offerings.

Check out the video below for an idea of what it can do.  The feature should be available now if you update your firmware and Notebook software.

Teaching With Technology – Interview Analysis

Interviewee

The interviewee was J.P. a junior high science teacher who teaches in rural Alberta.  J.P. has a BSc and a BEd and has devoted most of his teacher preparation to the performing arts and general sciences.  This is J.P.’s first full time teaching position and his second year teaching.  He has received a variety of professional development related to technology including interactive whiteboard sessions, technology implementation workshops and general classroom technology seminars.

School Setting

The school at which J.P. teaches as is a grade 7-12 high school with approximately 400 students.  In the past five years technology has been a financial and training focus and the school now has an interactive whiteboard in every classroom.  The school is site-managed and school administrators make all decisions regarding budgets, school goals and professional development.

Interview Setting

The interview was conducted online using Skype software and an audio recording of the conversation was made using audio-editing software called Audacity.  This method allowed me to easily and conveniently interview my former colleague from neighboring provinces.

Click the link below to view the Exerpts and Analysis of the interview.

Teaching With Technology – Interview Analysis

Geek.Menu for your USB

For those out there that haven’t heard of Portableapps.com you should probably check it out.  These small portable versions of popular applications for productivity (Openoffice.org, Gimp), internet (Firefox, Thunderbird) and many other uses are great to have on the go along with your files.

Now there is even a built in menu to keep the programs organized.  Check them out here.

Via Lifehacker

Good Use of Technology?

This week in my ETEC 533 class we are discussing the following questions:

What is a good use of technology in the math and science classroom? What would such a learning experience and environment look like? What would be some characteristics of what it is and what it isn’t?

With these questions in mind, bare with me as I explore what it means to deliver purposeful, technology-infused education.

Technology and science go hand in hand but implementing technology in a math or science classroom can be complicated. There are many aspects that are embody “good use” of technology and many pitfalls that educators often fall into.

In terms of implementing technology aspects like cost, access, ease of use and pedagogy must all be considered. Educational environments with poorly considered technological plans can sometimes experience expensive and time consuming complications. The nature of technology is fast-paced and ever-changing. As a result of this constant change technological decisions that lack foresight, organization and clear purpose often cost great sums of money with little educational advantages. For technology to be successfully used in the classroom those making the decisions must do so with extreme caution especially with long-term and potentially expensive initiatives.

First and foremost technology must serve a purpose in the educational setting. The key is to root the technology in sound pedagogical reasoning and have it serve a function in the classroom. In the end, technology should supplement and support traditional educational theories not supplant them. Technology in the classroom should be well rooted in the design and pedagogy of the course. Technology should not be “tacked-on” to a course; the course be built around technology. For example, if class websites or interactive notes are used in a fluid and thought-out manner than the potential for the technology to be distracting or appear separate from the lesson will be minimized. If teachers are able to use a mix of traditional methods and technological tools to support learning the best results will be achieved. 

The level of technology in a classroom should also strive to meet the needs and capabilities of both the teacher and the class. The technology should fit the educational setting to be purposeful, if there is no benefit for teacher or student it should be ignored and better options pursued.

With purposeful, pedagogically sound technology that fits the classroom learning can really benefit and in the end it falls on us as educators to match the technology to the classroom as best we can.

Hello World!

Hello one and all. This is my newest and hopefully most stable blog. This blog and its related sites will follow me as I complete my Masters of Educational Technology (MET) at the University of British Columbia.

In addition to posts related to my education I will also include relevant useful technology, website and the occasional distraction. thank you for visiting and I hope you enjoy my site.

  • For more information on this program and my work within it please visit my MET page.
  • For more information on me and what I am all about as an educator and technology enthusiast please visit my Homepage.

Thank you,

~Michel Lacoursiere